Legal Opinion · Dissent

STATE EX REL. PONCHIK v. Bradley

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided November 18, 2004No. 03-2958Published

1DissentDykman, J.

¶ 11. (dissenting). The majority has devised a new method of analyzing cases arising under State ex rel. Curtis v. Litscher, 2002 WI App 172, 256 Wis. 2d 787, 650 N.W.2d 43. While the method solves the issue in this case, ultimately, the cure is probably worse than the disease.

¶ 12. Inmates in foreign private prisons must petition foreign circuit or district courts to review their conditions of confinement cases. I have no quarrel with this concept, as usually applied, though it does not directly address Ponchik's situation. His situation, and that of all Wisconsin prisoners located in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In RE MARRIAGE OF COOK v. CookWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State Ex Rel. Curtis v. LitscherCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2002
  3. State Ex Rel. Myers v. SwensonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2004
  4. State v. CollinsCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API