Legal Opinion
Amos v. Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints
District Court, D. Utah
Decided January 11, 1984No. Civ. C-83-0492WPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER
WINDER, District Judge.
The defendants’ motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, for summary judgment was argued orally on October 12, 1983. The plaintiffs were represented by Elizabeth T. Dunning, David B. Watkiss and Molly B. Kenny. Paul E. Reimann appeared as amicus curiae. The defendants were represented by Dan S. Bushnell and M. Karlynn Hinman. Prior to the hearing, the court had carefully read all memoranda of counsel, including the amicus curiae brief and supplemental brief filed by Mr. Reimann. After the hearing, the court took the matter under advisement…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Lemon v. KurtzmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Wisconsin v. YoderSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Sherbert v. VernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints v. AmosSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Brehany v. Nordstrom, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1991
- Boisjoly v. Morton Thiokol, Inc.District Court, D. Utah · 1988
- Lown v. Salvation Army, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- Scott v. HammockDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1990
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.