Legal Opinion

Hill v. Wilkinson

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided May 10, 1939No. 6668PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLDEN, J. —

On the ground he was induced by fraud to purchase certain farm lands, respondent brought this action to recover the initial cash payment. Feb. 19, 1937, appellant Wilkinson agreed, in writing, to sell and appellant Watson agreed to purchase an 80 acre tract of land located in Jefferson county, Idaho. The contract, executory in form, together with a deed to the property was placed in escrow. March 26, 1937, appellant Wilkinson and wife agreed, in uniting, to sell and respondent Hill and wife agreed to purchase the same tract for the sum of $5,462.50. Respondent assumed and agreed…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Smith v. JohnsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Boomer v. IsleyIdaho Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Reinhold v. SpencerIdaho Supreme Court · 1933
  4. West v. PraterIdaho Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Smith v. ThomasIdaho Supreme Court · 1926

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Cole v. Fruitland Canning Ass'nIdaho Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Stallinger v. JohnsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Gore v. Richard Allen Mining Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Heisel v. CunninghamIdaho Supreme Court · 1971
  5. A. C. Frost & Co. v. Coeur D'Alene Mines Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 1941

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API