Legal Opinion

City of Denver v. Pearce

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 5, 1889No. 1804PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from District Court of Arapahoe County. The plaintiff, Rickard Pearce, alleges in his complaint, which was filed April 2, 1884, that he was then, and for a long time had been, seized in fee of a parcel of land situated in the city of Denver, described as follows: “All that certain piece of land lying between the western line of lot numbered nine (9) and Cherry creek and the northern line of Lawrence street, in the block numbered seventy-one (71), in the east division…

Read the full summary

Appeal from District Court of Arapahoe County. The plaintiff, Rickard Pearce, alleges in his complaint, which was filed April 2, 1884, that he was then, and for a long time had been, seized in fee of a parcel of land situated in the city of Denver, described as follows: “All that certain piece of land lying between the western line of lot numbered nine (9) and Cherry creek and the northern line of Lawrence street, in the block numbered seventy-one (71), in the east division of the city of Denver, excepting a strip adjoining the said lot 9, in said block 71, which is four feet in width,…

1Opinion of the Court

Pattison, C.

The issue between the parties in this case involves the title to so much of the premises above described as lie between the easterly bank of Cherry creek and the thread of the stream. No other question is discussed by counsel. The solution of this question requires consideration of the history of the title to the premises, and a construction of the conveyances under which the parties claim. This history must be looked for, not only in the evidence and in the deeds of conveyance set forth in the record, but also in the statutes of the United States and of this state relating to…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Louisville v. Savings BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. Mott v. . MottNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  3. Dunham v. . WilliamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1867
  4. Norcross v. GriffithsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Buck v. SquiersSupreme Court of Vermont · 1850

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. More v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1977
  2. Hanlon v. HobsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1897
  3. Smith v. Town of FowlerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1959
  4. Grizzly Bar, Inc. v. HartmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1969
  5. Dallas County v. ReynoldsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API