McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. National Aeronautics & Space Administration
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
LAMBERTH, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff McDonnell Douglas Aerospace Corporation’s (“MDA”) Rule 59(e) Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment. For the following reasons, Plaintiffs motion is denied.
I. Background
On June 9, 2000, this Court dismissed as moot this reverse-Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”) litigation. Although neither party had argued that the case was moot, and MDA requested an opportunity to address the mootness issue if the Court intended to consider it, the Court determined that Circuit caselaw is clear— withdrawal of a FOIA…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Liljeberg v. Health Services Acquisition Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Myrna O'Dell Firestone v. Leonard K. FirestoneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- City of Erie v. Pap's A. M.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Plaut v. Spendthrift Farm, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Cobell v. NortonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002
- Regency Communications, Inc. v. Cleartel Communications, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2002
- Dyson v. WinfieldDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2001
- Higbee v. BillingtonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
- Amfac Resorts, L.L.C. v. United States Department of InteriorDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.