Dudek v. Pittsburgh City Fire Fighters, Local No. 1
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Concurrence
Concurring Opinion by
Mr. Justice Roberts:
This case requires our Court to resolve a conflict between the individual’s right of free expression1 and *245right of individuals to associate effectively for the furtherance of a common purpose.2 The untrammeled exercise of each of these rights is of fundamental significance to the functioning of any complex society which aspires to be a free one.
For individuals to exercise their right to unite effectively for a common purpose the voluntary groups which they form must be able to discipline and expel members whose conduct obstructs the realization of the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- International Ass'n of MacHinists v. StreetSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Spayd v. Ringing Rock LodgeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
- Pa. L. R. B. v. Ches. Del. Cos. BartendersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
- Allis-Chalmers Manufacturing Company v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1966
- Mitchell v. International Ass'n of MacHinistsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961