Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Dudek v. Pittsburgh City Fire Fighters, Local No. 1

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 25, 1967No. Appeal, No. 82Published

1Concurrence

Concurring Opinion by

Mr. Justice Roberts:

This case requires our Court to resolve a conflict between the individual’s right of free expression1 and *245right of individuals to associate effectively for the furtherance of a common purpose.2 The untrammeled exercise of each of these rights is of fundamental significance to the functioning of any complex society which aspires to be a free one.

For individuals to exercise their right to unite effectively for a common purpose the voluntary groups which they form must be able to discipline and expel members whose conduct obstructs the realization of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. International Ass'n of MacHinists v. StreetSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Spayd v. Ringing Rock LodgeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  3. Pa. L. R. B. v. Ches. Del. Cos. BartendersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  4. Allis-Chalmers Manufacturing Company v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1966
  5. Mitchell v. International Ass'n of MacHinistsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API