Legal Opinion

Bardon v. Land & River Improvement Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 25, 1895No. 138PublishedCited by 26 opinions

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. This was a bill in equity, filed under section 3186 of the Revised Statutes of the State of Wisconsin, by the Land and River Improvement Company, a corporation of New Jersey, against Thomas Bardon, a citizen of the State of Wisconsin, in the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western District of Wisconsin, to have certain conveyances declared void and to quiet the title to the…

Read the full summary

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. This was a bill in equity, filed under section 3186 of the Revised Statutes of the State of Wisconsin, by the Land and River Improvement Company, a corporation of New Jersey, against Thomas Bardon, a citizen of the State of Wisconsin, in the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western District of Wisconsin, to have certain conveyances declared void and to quiet the title to the southeast quarter of section.28, township 49 N., range 14 W., in Douglas County, Wisconsin. The section in question is as…

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Chief' Justice Fuller

delivered the opinion of the court.

We remarked in Gormley v. Clark, 134 U. S. 338, 348, that while the rule was well settled that remedies in the courts of the United States at common law or in equity, according to the' essential character of the case, are uncontrolled in that particular by the practice of the state courts, yet an enlargement of equitable rights by state statutes may be administered by the Circuit Courts of the United States, as well as by the courts of the State; and when the case is one of a remedial proceeding, essentially of an equitable…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Case of Broderick's WillSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  2. Holland v. ChallenSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. Leffingwell v. WarrenSupreme Court of the United States · 1862
  4. Frost v. SpitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  5. Gormley v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1890

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Smyth v. AmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. Smyth v. Ames; Smyth v. Smith; Smyth v. HigginsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  3. Smith v. ReevesSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  4. Pusey & Jones Co. v. HanssenSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  5. Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. Sun Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1951

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API