Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Hamilton v. Henderson

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 2, 1938PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBland, J.

This is a proceeding in habeas corpus, wherein the petitioner, Mattie M. Hamilton, seeks to be discharged from the custody of the respondents, Mitchel J. Henderson and Mrs. J. B. Biederman.

The facts show that on May 7, 1936, petitioner was. adjudged to be a person of unsound mind by the Probate Court of Jackson county, over which the respondent, Mitchel J. Henderson, presides as judge; that one A. P. Hamilton was appointed guardian of her person and curator of her estate; that, on the application to said court of said guardian and Maggie Kirkham and Mrs. Maude Banta, the petitioner, on July…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. In Matter of BadgerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1920
  2. Wadsworth v. . Sharpsteen and MoffatNew York Court of Appeals · 1853
  3. In re MorganSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
  4. In re HowellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1918
  5. Ex Parte Higgins v. HoctorSupreme Court of Missouri · 1933

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Barrett v. Hunter, Warden. Rutledge v. Hunter, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1950
  2. White v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1989
  3. In Re LinkSupreme Court of Missouri · 1986
  4. In Re F____ C____Missouri Court of Appeals · 1972
  5. Overholser v. TreiblyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1945

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API