Hamilton v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MORRISON, Judge.
The offense is possession of heroin; the punishment, life.
Appellant’s first ground of error is that the trial court erred in not quashing the enhancement paragraphs of the indictment. Following the jury verdict finding appellant guilty, the issue of punishment was submitted to the court pursuant to Art. 37.07, subd. 2(b), Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P., and the State waived the enhancement paragraphs of the indictment. Since such paragraphs were not read to the jury, and therefore could not have prejudiced appellant as regards the jury’s verdict, and since the punishment assessed…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Acosta v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1966
- Hernandez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1968
- King v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1967
- Gill v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1948
- Porter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1969
3Cited by10 opinions
- Noah v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
- Green v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971
- Weeks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
- Sifford v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1986
- Royal v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1969
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.