Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Rio Algom Ltd.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided April 30, 1979No. MDL 342; No. 76 C 3830PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION

MARSHALL, District Judge.

Plaintiff Westinghouse Electric Corporation has moved to dismiss various counterclaims filed by seven defendants — Atlas Corporation, Anaconda Company, Kerr-McGee Corporation, Homestake Mining Company, Western Nuclear, Inc., Getty Oil Company, and Utah International, Inc. Westinghouse’s motions fall into three categories. First, it challenges the standing of five counterclaimants — Atlas, Anaconda, Kerr-McGee, Getty and Homestake — to allege that Westinghouse has violated Section 2 of the Sherman Act by unlawfully monopolizing, attempting to…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. Illinois Brick Co. v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Times-Picayune Publishing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  4. Fortner Enterprises, Inc. v. United States Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. United States v. Loew's Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re Uranium Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API