Legal Opinion

United States v. Michael Sevane Rhynes, United States of America v. Michael Sevane Rhynes

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided July 10, 2000No. 97-4466, 97-4640Published

1Opinion of the Court

218 F.3d 310 (4th Cir. 2000)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

MICHAEL SEVANE RHYNES, Defendant-Appellant.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

MICHAEL SEVANE RHYNES, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 97-4466 No. 97-4640 (CR-96-6-V).

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS, FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT.

Argued: April 4, 2000.

Decided: July 10, 2000.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte.

Richard L. Voorhees, District Judge.[Copyrighted Material Omitted]

COUNSEL ARGUED: Michael Smith Scofield, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellant.…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Widener; Concurring in the judgment; Concurrence · Luttig; Dissent · Wilkinson; Dissent · Niemeyer.

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  2. General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Koon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Geders v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp. v. BonjornoSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API