Legal Opinion

In Re Adams

United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided March 26, 2002No. 19-05336PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION ON FORD’S MOTION FOR A NEW TRIAL

JACK B. SCHMETTERER, Bankruptcy Judge.

The issue discussed here arose in the Chapter 13 Bankruptcy case of Michael and Lynette Adams (“Debtors”).

Following the original ruling herein discussed in an opinion published at 270 B.R. 263 (Bankr.N.D.Ill.2001) (“Opinion”), creditor Ford Motor Company (“Ford”) moved for a new trial under Fed.R.Bankr.P. 9023, seeking to reverse an earlier ruling entered December 4, 2001. 1 Relevant history and facts were discussed in the earlier opinion and will not be fully repeated here. Nor will the reasoning in that…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Hughes Aircraft Co. v. JacobsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. William McNabola v. Chicago Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
  4. In the Matter of Jartran, Inc., Debtor. Appeal of Reuben H. Donnelley Corporation and Sandra C. Tinsley, IncCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
  5. Lawrence Tractor Co. v. GregoryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re PerezUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2006
  2. Friedman v. P+P, LLC (In Re Friedman)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  3. In Re MorningstarUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana · 2010
  4. Capital One v. Nathan OsbornUnited States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
  5. In re: Gregory A. Friedman and Judith Mercer-FriedmanUnited States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API