Fort Sill Apache Tribe of Oklahoma v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1DissentNichols, Judge
With all respect I am unable to join or agree with the majority. I think the claimant tribe was entitled to a hearing on the merits. It is not that I see it as certain or even probable that they would prevail. I know that one’s simplistic assessment of the rights and wrongs of this old case could suffer much transformation as the evidence unfolded. It is just that I fail to see this as the kind of case the Indian Claims Commission could refuse to consider at all, as wholly outside its statutory jurisdiction. I think, if claimants have their day in court, the purpose of Congress is better…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- McClanahan v. Arizona State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- In Re YamashitaSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- United States v. Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Northwestern Bands of Shoshone Indians v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- United States v. Choctaw NationSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.