Legal Opinion
Gray v. City of St. Paul
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 12, 1957No. 37,019PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Nelson, Justice.
Certiorari for review of decision of the Industrial Commission. The respondent, Robert J. Gray, filed a petition for compensation and benefits under our Workmen’s Compensation Act, M. S. A. c. 176, by virtue of having contracted the disease of tuberculosis from a fellow police officer with whom he worked while in the employ of relator, the city of St. Paul.
Gray was first employed by the police department of St. Paul in July 1949. During the year of 1951 Gray and a fellow police officer were in contact with each other in the course of their duties as police officers. It appears…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Markham v. CabellSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Matter of Goldberg v. 954 Marcy Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1938
- Glodenis v. American Brass Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
- Lelenko v. Wilson H. Lee Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1942
- Industrial Commission v. Corwin HospitalSupreme Court of Colorado · 1952
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Young v. City of HuntsvilleCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1976
- Fink v. Cold Spring Granite Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
- Flor v. HolguinHawaii Supreme Court · 2000
- Anderson v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- Schmillen v. Dave Schroeder GrocerySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.