Legal Opinion

United States v. Jancarek

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided May 13, 1986No. CM 447462PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

WOLD, Senior Judge:

Appellant’s trial defense counsel requested the trial judge to order a sanity board pursuant to Rule for Courts-Martial [R.C.M.] 706 to inquire into appellant’s mental capacity to stand trial. In support of his request, the trial defense counsel offered to prove (1) that appellant had, approximately one month earlier, been admitted to the local military hospital as a result of an “alleged suicidal gesture,” and (2) that he was unable to communicate effectively and completely with appellant. The government rejoined that a sanity board was unnecessary…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Helvering v. GowranSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Jennifer Mannino, a Minor, by and Through Her Next Friend and Parent and Natural Guardian, Richard Mannino v. International Manufacturing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
  3. United States v. Phillip Brooks BarkerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1977
  4. Wear v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1954
  5. United States v. NixUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1965

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. EnglishCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1997
  2. United States v. CollinsArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 1994
  3. United States v. EnglishNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 1996
  4. United States v. JamesArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 1997
  5. United States v. MackieUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2007

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API