Legal Opinion

United States v. English

Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided April 19, 1996No. NMCM 94 01776PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LUCAS, Judge:

Contrary to his pleas, the appellant was convicted by special court-martial, military judge alone, of attempted malingering, fail*613ure to go to his appointed place of duty, and malingering, in violation of Articles 80, 86, and 115, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 880, 886, and 915 respectively.

We have examined the record of trial, the assignments of error,1 and the Government’s response thereto. We have also considered the excellent oral arguments by both parties. We do not comment on Assignments of Error II or III other than to indicate that we find them to have no…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wear v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1954
  2. United States v. NixUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1965
  3. United States v. JancarekU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1986

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. EnglishCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1997
  2. United States v. EnglishCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API