Cordray v. Savannah, Thunderbolt & Isle of Hope Railway
Supreme Court of Georgia
Action for damages. Before Judge Norwood. City court of Savannah. September 2, 1902.
1Opinion of the CourtLamar, J.
The plaintiff, while driving his wagon across the tracks of the railroad company, suffered damage, and he obtained a verdict. The court granted a new trial. The plaintiff excepted, *465but does not'bring the case within the exception of the Civil Code, •§ 5585. We are not, therefore, authorized to disturb the finding by the lower court, even though the motion was granted for a specific reason, which may or may not have required a new trial. Weinkle v. Brunswick R. Co., 107 Ga. 367 (1).
The railroad company, by cross-bill of exceptions, raises the question as to whether, as a street-railroad…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Weinkle & Sons v. Brunswick & Western RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
- Holbrook v. . the Utica and Schenectady Railroad Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1855
- Augusta & Summerville Railroad v. RandallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1887
- Savannah, Thunderbolt & Isle of Hope Railway v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Electric Railway Co. v. CarsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1896
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Greeson v. BaileySupreme Court of Georgia · 1929
- Cox v. GradySupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
- Murray v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1932
- Atlanta Railway & Power Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Georgia Railway & Electric Co. v. CarrollSupreme Court of Georgia · 1915
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.