Burnham Loan & Investment Co. v. Sethman
Supreme Court of Colorado
Error to Denver District Court, Hon. James H. Teller, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtGarrigues, J.
Statement.
Plaintiff below, The Burnham Loan & Investment Company, plaintiff in error, brought this (suit, as pledgee^ against George H. Sethman, on his promissory note for *191$10,002.00, given to the German-American Indemnity Company, in payment for stock, and negotiated and delivered to plaintiff, by one S. N. Mitchell, as collateral security to his note for $3,000.00. The trial court found that plaintiff was not a holder in due course, basing its finding upon a lack of diligent inquiry amounting to bad faith, in accepting the note, and rendered judgment in favor of defendant.
Plaintiff’s…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Fillebrown v. HaywardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
- Merchants' Bank v. McClellandSupreme Court of Colorado · 1886
- Doe v. Northwestern Coal & Transportation Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Oregon · 1896
- Tourtelotte v. BrownColorado Court of Appeals · 1892
- Coors v. German Nat. BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1890
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Myers v. LashleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
- Hess v. Iowa Bankers Mortgage Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1924
- Hukill v. McGinnisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1921
- Italian American Bank v. CarosellaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1927
- State Bank v. Iowa-Des Moines National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1937
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.