Legal Opinion

Myers v. Lashley

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 20, 2002No. 96,102PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOpala, J.

1 The sole issue presented by this appeal is whether the evidentiary materials demonstrate a nonactionable claim because the defendant-psychologist's conduct in contest is within the range of her qualified statutory privilege2 for good-faith reporting of child abuse? We answer in the affirmative.

I

THE ANATOMY OF LITIGATION

12 This is an appeal from summary judgment for the defendant Karen H. Lashley, Ph.D. [Dr. Lashley], in an action by Steve Myers [father] and his mother, Phyllis Myers [grandmother] [both plaintiffs named Myers will be referred to as plaintiffs or Myers (in the plural) ], to…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Salve Regina College v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Ultramares Corp. v. ToucheNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  3. Kluver v. Weatherford Hospital AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
  4. Manley v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
  5. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. EakinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Lowery v. Echostar Satellite Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
  2. Evers v. FSF Overlake AssociatesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
  3. Vasek v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
  4. Hedges v. HedgesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
  5. FARLEY v. CITY OF CLAREMORESupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API