Legal Opinion

People v. Padilla

Criminal Court of the City of New York

Decided April 30, 1992PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Ruth Pickholz, J.

Defendant is charged with petit larceny (Penal Law *595§ 155.25) and criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree (Penal Law § 165.40). He moves to suppress certain physical evidence on the ground that it was the product of a statement that had been "involuntarily made” within the meaning of CPL 60.45 (2) (a).

In a written opinion dated April 20, 1992, this court granted defendant’s motion to suppress statement evidence (see, 154 Misc 2d 585). Defendant has been charged with stealing the contents of a mail package entrusted to him in his capacity…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. HarrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. People v. JonesNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. People v. GrilloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  4. People v. PadillaCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1992

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. SorboNew York Supreme Court · 1996
  2. People v. BarhamNassau County District Court · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API