Legal Opinion
Aero Testing & Balancing System Inc. v. Human Rights Commission
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided June 28, 1989No. 1-88-1353PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JUSTICE McNAMARA *
delivered the opinion of the court:
Petitioner, Aero Testing & Balancing Systems, Inc., a division of Climatemp, Inc., appeals from a decision of the Illinois Human Rights Commission (Commission) which held that Aero discriminated against its employee, Jack Pachowicz, on the basis of his handicap, multiple sclerosis. An administrative law judge (ALJ) found unlawful discrimination and recommended eight months’ back pay and benefits, plus $39,095 of the requested $51,404 as attorney fees and costs. The Commission, with one dissenting member, adopted the ALJ’s findings and…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Dolores J. Copeland, Individually and on Behalf of the Class of All Others Similarly Situated v. F. Ray Marshall, Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Castaneda v. Illinois Human Rights CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
- J.B. Esker & Sons, Inc. v. Cle-Pa's PartnershipAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001
- Vogue Tyre & Rubber Co. v. Office of the State Fire MarshalAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
- J.B. Esker & Sons, Inc. v. Cle-Pa's PartnershipAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001
- Vogue Tyre & Rubber Co. v. Office of the State Fire MarshalAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004