Ravely v. Isensee
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Pugh, Dist. J.
The material facts in this case of which the following is a summary are undisputed. On August 28, 1920, one Ivlenk, sold to Grainmen Printing Company, a corporation, on deferred payments, certain personal property then used, and to be used, in the operation of a printing plant at Courtenay. The sale was evidenced by a written contract. No reservation of title to the property sold was made. The corporation thereupon took possession of the property, and, • until the happening of the events hereinafter detailed, used the property in and about its printing business. Plaintiff was…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- McLaughlin v. WheelerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1891
- Brady v. OnffroyWashington Supreme Court · 1905
- Kiewel v. TannerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
- San Francisco Sulphur Co. v. Aetna Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1909
- Moffitt v. GarrettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Sloan v. YoungMontana Supreme Court · 1930