Legal Opinion
United States v. Baker
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
Decided August 24, 2011No. 11-6007/ARPublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judge ERDMANN delivered the opinion of the court.
Specialist Demetrice K. Baker was charged with two specifications of indecent exposure and two specifications of assault in violation of Articles 120 and 128(a), Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. §§ 920(n), 928(a) (2006). Prior to trial the military judge granted a motion to suppress evidence of an initial photo identification and later in-court identification made by the victim. The Government appealed that ruling to the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals pursuant to Article 62, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 862. The Army court…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Manson v. BrathwaiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. AyalaCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1995
- Biggers v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- United States v. WicksCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2014
- United States v. BufordCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2015
- United States v. HenningCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2016
- United States v. BowserUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2014
- United States v. MazaNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2014
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.