Legal Opinion

Young v. Hinds

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 15, 1920No. 9341PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to Denver District Court, Hon. John I. Mullins, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scott

This case was submitted to the trial court upon' an agreed statement of fact, with separate prayers for relief by the opposing parties. It appears that one R. J. Walker had been for some years the common loan agent for Alona A. Hinds, Elizabeth D. Milliken and Lucie S. Young. It was his custom in the matter of such agency to loan moneys of each of such persons on real estate security. The promissory notes in each case were sent to the separate owners, while Walker retained possession of the securities.

In February, 1910, The Colorado Fruit and Garden Company executed and delivered to Walker as…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Warren v. AdamsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1894
  2. Cree v. LewisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1910
  3. Walker v. BruceSupreme Court of Colorado · 1908
  4. Lipscomb v. NicholsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1882
  5. McPherrin v. FairSupreme Court of Colorado · 1914

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. O'Byrne v. McNeillSupreme Court of Colorado · 1932
  2. Schwab v. WageleySupreme Court of Colorado · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API