Douglass v. Unmack
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Action upon a replevin bond, brought to the Superior Court in New Haven County and tried to the jury before Ralph Wheeler, J. ; verdict and judgment for the defendants, and appeal by the plaintiff.
1Opinion of the CourtBaldwin, J.
General Statutes, § 1057, provides that no writ of replevin shall be issued “ until some person, known to the authority signing the writ to be of sufficient responsibility, has entered into a recognizance before him, with at least one sufficient surety, in a sum at least double said sworn value of said property, conditioned that the plaintiff shall prosecute his suit to effect, and for the payment of any judgment that may be recovered by the defendant in the suit, and for the return of the property to him, and payment to him of all damages sustained by the replevy thereof, if the plaintiff…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Plumb v. CurtisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1895
- Ferry v. BurchardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1852
- Walko v. WalkoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1894
- Wheelock v. PierceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1850
- Rosen v. FischelSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1877
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- D'Andrea v. RendeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
- Wooley v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
- Butterfield v. BradySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
- Wolfe v. Wallingford Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
- Wolfe v. Wallingford Bank & Trust Co.Connecticut Superior Court · 1936