Legal Opinion

Faust v. Beale

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 7, 1938No. 26821PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStephens, P. J.

The act of 1933 (Ga. L. 1933 pp. 290, 294, § 42(h)), provides that “in all cases wherein the amount involved . . is $300 or more, the order overruling or refusing the motion for new trial or the final order or judgment of the trial court, as the case may be, shall be subject to review by bill of exceptions to the Court of Appeals or the Supreme Court.” Whether “the amount involved” is to be determined by the amount sued for or claimed in the pleadings, or by the amount represented in the verdict or judgment, the amount found for the plaintiff, in a verdict in the municipal court of Atlanta,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hindman v. RaperSupreme Court of Georgia · 1915
  2. Cox v. Dolvin Realty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1937
  3. Jones v. BlackwelderSupreme Court of Georgia · 1915

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Franzen v. WallCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1947
  2. Cater v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API