Legal Opinion

H.V. v. Kitchen

U S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided July 8, 2016No. MISC. DOCKET NO. 001-16PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER—PANEL THIRTY-FIVE

McClelland, Chief Judge;

Petitioner, an alleged victim of a crime under the Uniform Code of Military Justice *718(UCMJ), seeks extraordinary relief in the nature of a writ of mandamus requiring the military judge in the court-martial case of ■United States v. Randolph to comply with Military Rule of Evidence 513, Manual for Courts-Martial, United -States (2012 ed.), as amended by Executive Order 13696, 80 Fed. Reg. 35,783 (17 June 2015), asserting that the military judge erred by ordering production to the defense of certain mental health records of Petitioner.

Pursuant to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Jaffee v. RedmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Hasan v. GrossCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2012
  3. Stark v. Hartt Transportation Systems, Inc.District Court, D. Maine · 2013

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Randolph v. HV and United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2017
  2. In Re C. PU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 2019
  3. United States v. MelletteNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2021
  4. United States v. Sergeant LUIS A. RODRIGUEZ JR.Army Court of Criminal Appeals · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API