Legal Opinion

Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation v. Apple, Inc.

District Court, W.D. Wisconsin

Decided October 15, 2015No. 14-cv-062-wmcPublished

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

WILLIAM M. CONLEY, District Judge.

Defendant Apple, Inc. previously sought summary judgment on plaintiff Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation’s willful infringement claim on the basis that WARF cannot show by clear and convincing evidence that Apple “acted despite an objectively high likelihood that its actions constituted infringement of- a valid patent.” In re Seagate Technology, LLC, 497 F.3d 1360, 1371 (Fed.Cir.2007) (en banc). “In that opinion and order, the court denied Apple’s motion with respect to- certain defenses, but reserved on remaining bases— including Apple’s…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In Re Seagate Technology, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
  2. Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. v. W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
  3. Spine Solutions, Inc. v. Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
  4. Halo Electronics, Inc. v. Pulse Electronics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
  5. Douglas Dynamics, LLC v. Buyers Products Co.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2010

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API