Goldsmith v. Clausen
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Lee District Court. Foreclosure. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion of the Court. cited Pomroy & Co. v. Parmlee, 9 Iowa, 146. cited O' Connor v. Mullen, 11 HI., 59; Lyon v. Boilvin, 2 Selw., 629 ; Róbb v. Bostwich, 4 Scam. 116; Rev., 1860j §§c8498-3500.
1Opinion of the CourtLowe, J.
On the fifth day of June, 1860, a judgment of foreclosure was entered ‘for the plaintiff in the sum of $216.28, being the supposed unpaid balance due on a thousand dollar mortgage. This judgment was rendered in pursuance of an agreement entered into between the parties on the. 14th day of April, 18'60, to the effect that the plaintiff should have, at the next succeeding term, a decree of foreclosure for the amount of his claim and ten per cent interest, taking into account a receipt for fifty dollars which is called damages for non-payment of said claim, the amount to be assessed by the…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Ind. Dist. v. Dist. Tp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1876
- Greazel v. PriceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907