Legal Opinion

Greazel v. Price

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided July 3, 1907PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Johnson DistHct Court.— How. O. A. Byington, Judge. Action in equity to foreclose a mechanic’s lien. The. trial resulted in a judgment in favor of defendants. Subsequent to the entry of the judgment plaintiff presented a motion to correct the record entry, and this motion was overruled. Plaintiff appeals from the judgment and from the ruling on the motion to correct.

1Opinion of the CourtBishop, J.

1 judgment entry correction of record. I. The judgment was- entered on the records of the court below as of date June 12, 1905. The importance of the motion to correct, and the ruling thereon, becomes manifest when it is considered that the appeal from the judgment was not taken Imtil January 10, 1906, being more than six months as allowed by law for taking an appeal. Of course, if the appeal from the judgment was not timely, it is an end of the case, and a motion filed in this court by appellee to dismiss should be sustained. We shall therefore first consider the question arising out of the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Stutsman v. SharplessSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  2. Callanan v. VotrubaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
  3. Martin v. MartinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  4. Buck v. HoltSupreme Court of Iowa · 1888
  5. King v. DicksonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1901

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. HarbourSupreme Court of Iowa · 1949
  2. Abell v. HowatSupreme Court of Iowa · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API