Legal Opinion
Chas. H. Lilly Co. v. I. F. Laucks, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 21, 1933No. 7083PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SAWTELLE, Circuit Judge.
On March 27, 1928> appellee filed in the District Court its “Bill of Complaint for Injunction and Accounting of Profits and Damages for Infringement of Reissued Patent No. 16,422 (Originally 1,460,757),” naming as defendants the Chas. H. Lilly Company and Wilmot H. Lilly, its president, as contributory infringers of the patent, and Kaseno Products Company and George F. Linquist, its president, as direct infringers. From a decree in favor of plaintiff-appellee, upholding the validity of the patent and the charge of contributory infringement, the Chas. H. Lilly Company…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Virginian Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Motion Picture Patents Co. v. Universal Film Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Henry v. A. B. Dick Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Leeds & Catlin Company v. Victor Talking Machine Company (No. 2)Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Kalem Co. v. Harper BrothersSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Aralac, Inc. v. Hat Corporation of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
- Fromberg, Inc. v. Jack W. ThornhillCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
- Kemart Corp. v. Printing Arts Research Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953
- The UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS FOUND. v. Block Drug Co.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 1955
- Welding Engineers, Inc. v. Ætna-Standard Engineering Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1958
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.