Beck v. Borough of Manheim
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
TROUTMAN, District Judge.
Although the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq. (ADEA), generally proscribes arbitrary discrimination based on age in employment practices, Oscar Mayer & Co. v. Evans, 441 U.S. 750, 99 S.Ct. 2066, 60 L.Ed.2d 609 (1979), the Act does allow employers to use age as a legitimate criterion “where age is a bona fide occupational qualification reasonably necessary to the normal operation of the particular business ...” 29 U.S.C. § 623(f)(1). See Marshall v. Westinghouse Electric Corp., 576 F.2d 588 (5th Cir.…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Massachusetts Board of Retirement v. MurgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Celia SANCHEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STANDARD BRANDS, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- Oscar Mayer & Co. v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Andrus v. AllardSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Virginia v. RivesSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Stanley ORZEL, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CITY OF WAUWATOSA FIRE DEPARTMENT, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- Gottlieb v. Firestone Steel Products Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
- Gerard Tookmanian v. Safe Harbor Water Power Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
- Maki v. Commissioner of Educ. of State of NYDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1983
- Burke v. Leader Dogs for the BlindDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.