Legal Opinion

Beck v. Borough of Manheim

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided January 14, 1981No. Civ. A. 80-1092PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

TROUTMAN, District Judge.

Although the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq. (ADEA), generally proscribes arbitrary discrimination based on age in employment practices, Oscar Mayer & Co. v. Evans, 441 U.S. 750, 99 S.Ct. 2066, 60 L.Ed.2d 609 (1979), the Act does allow employers to use age as a legitimate criterion “where age is a bona fide occupational qualification reasonably necessary to the normal operation of the particular business ...” 29 U.S.C. § 623(f)(1). See Marshall v. Westinghouse Electric Corp., 576 F.2d 588 (5th Cir.…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Massachusetts Board of Retirement v. MurgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Celia SANCHEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STANDARD BRANDS, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
  3. Oscar Mayer & Co. v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Andrus v. AllardSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Virginia v. RivesSupreme Court of the United States · 1880

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Stanley ORZEL, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CITY OF WAUWATOSA FIRE DEPARTMENT, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
  2. Gottlieb v. Firestone Steel Products Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Gerard Tookmanian v. Safe Harbor Water Power Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Maki v. Commissioner of Educ. of State of NYDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1983
  5. Burke v. Leader Dogs for the BlindDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API