Legal Opinion

Reverse Vending Associates v. Tomra Systems US, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 10, 1987No. Civ. A. 86-4857PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

RAYMOND J. BRODERICK, District Judge.

Plaintiff Reverse Vending Associates brings this diversity action against defendants A/S Tomra Systems and Tomra United States, Inc. Presently before this Court is defendant A/S Tomra Systems’ motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure on the ground that this Court lacks personal jurisdiction over it. Defendant’s motion will be granted.

A/S Tomra Systems (“Tomra Norway”) is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of Norway with its principal place of business in Asker, Norway. Tom-ra Norway…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. Shaffer v. HeitnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Outokumpu Engineering Enterprises, Inc. v. Kvaerner EnviroPower, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 1996
  2. Ragan v. Tri-County Excavating, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  3. Arch v. American Tobacco Co., Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1997
  4. Federal Deposit Insurance v. HiattNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Wheeling-Pittsburgh Steel Corp. v. Intersteel, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1990

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API