Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Contributory Retirement Appeal Board

Massachusetts Superior Court

Decided August 20, 1993No. 92-6228GPublished

1Opinion of the CourtGarsh, J.

The plaintiff, Irma Anderson, brings this action pursuant to G.L.c. 30A, §14 seeking judicial review of the decision by the Contributory Retirement Appeal Board (“CRAB”) to deny plaintiffs application for survivor benefits pursuant to G.L.c. 32, §12(2)(d) (“Section 12”). The plaintiff challenges the decision of CRAB to deny her benefits on the grounds that it is not supported by substantial evidence, is arbitrary and capricious, and is wrong as a matter of law. For the reasons stated below, the Board’s decision is vacated.

BACKGROUND

The plaintiff married Craig Anderson in 1958 and the couple…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Merisme v. Board of Appeals on Motor Vehicle Liability Policies & BondsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1989
  2. Seagram Distillers Co. v. Alcoholic Beverages Control CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988
  3. Almeida Bus Lines, Inc. v. Department of Public UtilitiesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965
  4. Faith Assembly of God of South Dennis & Hyannis, Inc. v. State Building Code CommissionMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1981
  5. Warcewicz v. Department of Environmental ProtectionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API