Legal Opinion

Principal Life Insurance Company v. Howard-Kembitzky

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided May 1, 2023No. 2:22-cv-03421Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION PRINCIPAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, Civil Action 2:22-cv-3421 v. Magistrate Judge Chelsey M. Vascura DENISE M. HOWARD-KEMBITZKY, et al., Defendants. OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff, Principal Life Insurance Company, commenced this action in interpleader against Defendants, Denise Howard-Kembitzky and Mindy Darby, two potential beneficiaries of a life insurance plan governed by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C. § 1001, et seq. (“ERISA”), to determine to whom life insurance benefits should…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Egelhoff v. Egelhoff Ex Rel. BreinerSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  2. Edward Antoine v. Atlas Turner, Inc., Royal Insurance Company of Canada Canadian General Insurance Company and Federal Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
  3. McMillan v. ParrottCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
  4. Benjamin Quirindongo Pacheco v. Jose L. Rolon MoralesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
  5. 20 Employee Benefits Cas. 1097, Pens. Plan Guide (Cch) P 23919g Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Mary M. Pressley, Personal Representative for the Estate of Alvin J. Pressley, Deceased, Barbara J. PressleyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API