Wiregrass Const. v. Tallapoosa River Elec.
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
This is the appeal of an action on a contract. The trial court, after an ore tenus hearing, entered judgment for the plaintiff. The defendant has appealed the adverse judgment of the trial court and that court's interpretation of the contract.
The dispositive issue before this court is whether the trial court erred in its interpretation of the agreement. We hold that it did and reverse the judgment rendered below.
The record before us reveals the following: The plaintiff and defendant entered into a written contract in 1974 under which the plaintiff agreed to furnish electrical service to the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Jewell v. Jackson & Whitsitt Cotton Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1975
- Kinmon v. J. P. King Auction Company, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1973
- Johnson-Rast & Hays, Inc. v. ColeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975
- Charles H. McCauley Associates v. SnookSupreme Court of Alabama · 1976
- Southern Cafeteria Operating Company, Inc. v. EleyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1974
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Smiths Water Auth. v. City of Phenix CitySupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
- Bituminous Cas. Corp. v. HarrisCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1979
- Wood v. Central Bank of the SouthCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1982
- Universal Development Corp. v. ShaderSupreme Court of Alabama · 1980
- Holland v. CONTINENTAL TELEPHONE CO. OF SOUTHSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.