McGlyn v. Johnson

The communication addressed to the court on March 5, 1959 by the attorney for the defendant Seaman is deemed a motion to reargue. The said defendant calls attention to an erroneous quote by the court of the wording of a motion made by him to set the verdict aside. He insists that the motion to set aside was not directed to “ the weight of the evidence ” and that it was urged as incidental merely to the *1029motions made prior to the verdict for a dismissal of the complaint and for a directed verdict.

The court may have misconceived the nature of the motion. Whether there be any need to move to set…