Legal Opinion

Goldstein v. Goldstein

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 27, 1925PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Kapper, J.:

The action was for a divorce. The issue was tried before a jury, who found the defendant guilty of adultery. Upon the rendition of the verdict the defendant made a motion upon the minutes to set it aside, which the trial justice denied. Thereupon plaintiff entered an order accordingly. Pursuant to the practice required in such cases, the cause was placed upon the Special Term calendar, where an interlocutory judgment in plaintiff’s favor was directed to be entered. It is said by the appellant that what took place at Special Term was an inquest, due to her default by reason of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lowenthal v. . LowenthalNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
  2. Olmsted v. OlmstedAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
  3. Donnelly v. DonnellyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
  4. O'Keeffe v. O'KeeffeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Nazito v. HoltonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  2. Bolognino v. BologninoNew York Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Consolidated Laundries Corp. v. RothAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
  4. Arnold v. ArnoldNew York Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Lubuk v. LubukNew York Supreme Court · 1943

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API