Legal Opinion
Bendaoud v. Hodgson
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided September 24, 2008No. Civil Action 06cv11873-NGPublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS
GERTNER, District Judge:
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. BACKGROUND .260
A. Facts.260
B. Procedural History.262
II. LEGAL STANDARD.262
III. STANDING. to Oi to
A. Standing and § 1132(a)(2) Suits. B. Whether Bendaoud Has Alleged an Injury In Fact . to tO Oi Oi OO 00
1. Economic Loss to Analog Stock Fund Holdings as a Result of the
Backdating . 2. Bendaoud’s Economic Loss as a Result of Investing in the Analog to Oi CD
Stock Fund. to *C] *-*•
3. The Fiduciaries’ Unlawful Profit Through “Use Of’ Plan Assets-to •Ñ! CO
IV. WHETHER BENDAOUD HAS STATED A CLAIM UPON WHICH RELIEF CAN BE GRANTED .…
2Cases cited58 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Thomas Perez, Secretary v. Herbert BruisterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016
- Kanawi v. Bechtel Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2008
- Jones v. NovaStar Financial, Inc.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 2009
- Hill v. Vanderbilt Capital Advisors, LLCDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2011
- In re Boston Scientific Corp. Erisa LitigationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2008
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.