Legal Opinion

Frank W. Highley v. State of Vermont, Vermont Department of Corrections, Well Path, and Vita Core

District Court, D. Vermont

Decided September 14, 2026No. 2:25-cv-00011Unknown

1Opinion

FILcyU UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SEP 1H □□ 2S DISTRICT OF VERMONT BY __ Uw — FRANK W. HIGHLEY, ) Plaintiff, V. Case No. 2:25-cv-11 STATE OF VERMONT, VERMONT DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ) WELL PATH, AND VITA CORE, ) Defendants. ENTRY ORDER DISMISSING AMENDED COMPLAINT AND GRANTING PARTIAL LEAVE TO AMEND (Doc. 7) Plaintiff Frank W. Highley, a Vermont inmate representing himself, initially commenced this action against eleven defendants, asserting they violated his constitutional rights and raising a variety of state law claims. Upon review under

28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B) and 1915A, the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API