Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. DeFuria

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided July 13, 1987PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAbrams, J.

After a jury-waived trial, the defendant was convicted on ten indictments charging larceny of more than $100 and on ten indictments charging uttering a forged or altered instrument. G. L. c. 266, § 30 (1984 ed.). G. L. c. 267, § 5 (1984 ed.). The sole issue on appeal is whether, based on principles of double jeopardy, the District Court proceeding in this case bars the Superior Court trial. We transferred the case to this court on our own motion. We conclude that in the circumstances of this case, double jeopardy principles do not bar the Superior Court trial. Thus, we affirm the convictions.

T…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Serfass v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Crist v. BretzSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Commonwealth v. CundriffMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  5. Lataille v. District Court of Eastern HampdenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. BrunsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  2. Commonwealth v. AllainMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1994
  3. Commonwealth v. ZuzickMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1998
  4. Vizcaino v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2012
  5. Commonwealth v. ChapmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API