SAIF Corp. v. Falconer
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtDeits, C. J.
Employer petitions for review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board (Board) in which the Board held that claimant had proved that a neck condition, “torticollis,” was compensable under ORS 656.802, the “mental disorder” provisions of the occupational disease law. We affirm.
Claimant worked as a certified nursing assistant at employer’s residential care facility in eight-hour shifts. Her schedule was three days on and three days off. She normally cared for eight to ten residents per shift. On March 19,1995, one of the nurses scheduled to work was absent, but a new employee was there.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Mathel v. Josephine CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1994
- DiBrito v. SAIF Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1994
- Fuls v. SAIF Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1995
- Pense v. McCallOregon Supreme Court · 1966
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Estacada Rural Fire District 69 v. HullCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
- Intel Corp. v. BatchlerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- Labor Ready, Inc. v. GallimoreCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
- Labor Ready, Inc. v. GallimoreCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998