Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Pulemena

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 8, 1934No. Appeal 47PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Trexler, P. J.,

Jacob Pulemena was indicted for arson. He was found guilty of procuring some one to commit arson. The first matter urged by the appellant is that there was not sufficient evidence to convict of the commission of the crime, or to warrant a conviction on the count charging procuring. The evidence shows that the fire was of incendiary origin. An examination of all the testimony of the case has led us to the conclusion that there was sufficient evidence to prove the charge.

The testimony is substantially as follows: The fire was found raging in the rear of the dwelling…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Commonwealth v. FriedmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1930

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. PetroSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  2. Commonwealth v. PogachSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  3. Commonwealth v. RussellaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  4. Commonwealth v. MowadSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  5. Commonwealth v. CarthonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API