Legal Opinion

State v. Zabransky

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 19, 2000No. MC 97-21; CA A99281Published

1Opinion of the Court

998 P.2d 805 (2000)

166 Or. App. 672

In the Matter of Scott Jon Zabransky,

Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person.

STATE of Oregon, Respondent,

v.

Scott Jon ZABRANSKY, Appellant.

(MC 97-21; CA A99281).

Court of Appeals of Oregon, En Banc.

Argued and Submitted June 4, 1998.

Resubmitted February 16, 2000.

Decided April 19, 2000.

Hilary E. Berkman, Corvallis, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.

Richard D. Wasserman, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, and Michael D. Reynolds, Solicitor General.

Before DEITS, Chief…

Also in this document: Per curiam; Dissent · Edmonds; Dissent · Armstrong.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. AllisonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  2. State v. BuffumCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  3. State v. ZabranskyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  4. In Re the Guardianship & Conservatorship of GaliMontana Supreme Court · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API