Legal Opinion

State v. Zabransky

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 19, 2000No. MC 97-21; CA A99281PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant seeks review of the trial court’s order finding him to be mentally ill and committing him to the Mental Health Division for a period of 180 days. Appellant’s only argument that warrants discussion is that the trial court’s advice under ORS 426.100(1) was inadequate. That argument is identical in substance to the one that we considered and rejected in State v. Buffum, 166 Or App 552, 999 P2d 541 (2000)

Affirmed.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. BuffumCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. BuffumCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  2. State v. BuffumCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  3. State v. BurgeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  4. State v. BurgeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  5. State v. CachCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API