Legal Opinion
Finney v. Madico, Inc.
Massachusetts Appeals Court
Decided January 16, 1997No. 95-P-217PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKass, J.
After examining the materials on summary judgment and hearing argument, a judge of the Superior Court concluded that the plaintiff Janet M. Finney had adduced no more than stray remarks suggestive of impermissible bias, of the sort described in Johansen v. NCR Comten, Inc., 30 Mass. App. Ct. 294, 302 (1991), and that this was insufficient to make out her claim of unlawful discharge based on gender bias. We begin our review of whether summary judgment was correctly granted with an examination of that point. Also before us, on a cross appeal by the defendants, is a judgment *47in favor of Finney,…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Jose MEDINA-MUNOZ, Etc., Et Al., Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, Defendant, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. ThurstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Flesner v. Technical Communications Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
- Smith v. Stratus Computer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Sullivan v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
- Cerberus International, Ltd. v. Apollo Management L.P.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2002
- Wooster v. Abdow Corp.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1999
- Handrahan v. Red Roof Inns, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1997
- Griel v. Franklin Medical CenterDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1999
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.