Singletary v. Russo
District Court, E.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
II. Deprivation of Adequate Medical Care
Plaintiff's claim arises from defendants' alleged "deliberate indifference to [his] serious medical needs." Opp'n at 7. Such a claim is subject to a two-pronged analysis. First, an objective prong of the test requires that "the alleged deprivation of adequate medical care must be 'sufficiently serious.' " Salahuddin v. Goord , 467 F.3d 263, 279 (2d Cir. 2006) (quoting Farmer v. Brennan , 511 U.S. 825, 834, 114 S.Ct. 1970, 128 L.Ed.2d 811 (1994) ).2 Second, a subjective prong of the test requires plaintiff to show that defendants "acted intentionally to…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Coppedge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Barnes v. UzuDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2022
- Bass v. Cayuga CountyDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2024
- Carter v. Broome CountyDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2019
- Davis v. New York State Department of Corrections and Community SupervisionDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2020
- Flagg v. N.Y.S. Division of ParoleDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2020
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.