Legal Opinion

Stolowitz v. Stolowitz

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 10, 1980PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Bernard F. McCaffrey, J.

The cardinal issue of the discovery aspects of this matter involves one of first impression under the new equitable distribution law, that is, to what extent may the plaintiff wife seek discovery of the names and addresses of all the clients of the law firm, in which the defendant husband is a 25 % partner, for the purposes of contacting the firm’s clients to verify the accuracy of the law firm’s fee arrangement with its clients.

The plaintiff moved by order to show cause for varied pendente lite relief and certain discovery. Defendant, on the other…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Rios v. DonovanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
  2. In re the Appointment of a Guardian for Jacqueline F.New York Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. Matter of Kaplan (Blumenfeld)New York Court of Appeals · 1960
  4. Plancher v. PlancherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1970
  5. Hunter v. HunterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Harmon v. HarmonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  2. Kaye v. KayeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  3. Buckl v. BucklSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Lee v. LeeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  5. Travis v. TravisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API