Legal Opinion · Concurrence

United States v. Jose Antonio Gonzalez-Murillo

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided April 4, 2017No. 16-11464Published

1ConcurrenceRosenbaum, Circuit Judge

Of course, we are bound to apply the law as it is written. So that is what we do. Here, what the Sentencing Guidelines require is clear and unambiguous. I write separately to note only that the apparent incongruity of results between §§ 5G1.3 and 5K2.23 seems out of line with the purpose of § 5G1.3.

As we have indicated, the Supreme Court has described § 5G1.3 as an “attempt] to achieve some coordination of sentences imposed [where separate prosecutions occur based in part on the same relevant conduct] with an eye toward having such punishments approximate the total penalty that would have…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Witte v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. United States v. Todd Allen Dunham Arturo Alderete-MonsivaisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
  3. United States v. Michael Patrick OttoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
  4. United States v. James F. BidwellCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
  5. United States v. LucasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API