Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Todd Allen Dunham Arturo Alderete-Monsivais

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided July 3, 2002No. 00-2353, 01-1022PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KEITH, Circuit Judge.

Defendants-Appellants Todd Allen Dun-ham (“Dunham”) and Arturo Alderete-Monsivais (“Alderete-Monsivais”) were participants in a drug conspiracy that imported large quantities of marijuana and cocaine from the Republic of Mexico to drug dealers in the Lansing, Michigan area. The drugs were then distributed to numerous locations in the United States, including Texas, Colorado, and Illinois. Dunham pled guilty to one count of Conspiracy to Distribute and Possess With Intent to Distribute Marijuana, Cocaine, and Heroin, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846 and 841(a)(1),…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Koon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. McDonald v. Board of Election Comm'rs of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. United States v. BrazelCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
  4. United States v. Charles William McHan United States of America v. Charles William McHanCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
  5. United States v. George H. RuthCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. United States v. Phillip ClineCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
  2. United States v. Jabree WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020
  3. United States v. CarterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  4. Todd A. Dunham v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  5. United States v. Karl AmersonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API